#138. Tomboy nationalism
Welcome to the NRP. We are publishing the absolute best of those extremely online extremists known as the "New Right."
Wow, 138 issues! Thanks for reading.
đ§ľThreads of the Weekđ§ľ
> Deep the holler, where the banjos play, lived a purty hillbilly girl with patched overalls and a straw hat. Barefoot and wild, she chased critters down muddy back roads in her rusty pickup. Iffinâ you was lucky, you may have heard one of her homespun TikTok yarns about noodlinâ catfish or layinâ PEX, told in an endearing Alabammee twang.
Now, on tâother side of the hill lived a life-hating, makeup-caked, resentful F-T-F trans brownoid (and assorted homosexuals) who couldnât see the magic in confident huwhite women flexing on the third-worlders by having dirty, down-home fun, in tribute to their tough-as-nails, settler foremothers.
âTh-thatâs what uncivilized women do,â she said, shaking with rage, competing intrasexually. âY-you should be online shopping for $90 bottles of concealer, not having fun. Noooo, you canât be your own mistress! You canât build a house! You have to be a useless and bitter harem girl!â And the hillbilly girl just laughed and said, ââPreciate yâall.â
> True love is when you ask nothing of your partner and let them walk all over you because you have suppressed transcended your earthly desires.
> You think you live in a societyâŚand then the power goes out.
> Once in a generation a man is born. A man of his time. A man with the courage to say the most disgusting thing youâve ever heard (CONTENT WARNING), every single day, for years. Such a man is not meant to live forever. Not on this earthly plane, at least. He will live on in our hearts. *two hours later* Oh, heâs back. Great. Mutantâs back, everyone.
> This lowbie fan tagged the NRP to feature his thread about how misogyny from the right empowers the left, and wouldnât you know it: it wasnât half bad.
đ¸Women of the Week đ¸
> It appears that the new right in 2024 has been reduced to a thot policing squad, and no mere human woman can withstand its icy gaze. In this year alone, weâve reviewed and found wanting the following femoids:
Girls who want revenge against neglectful breakdancing fathers
Girls who âget marriedâ on their bday (see below)
Girls who like boy stuff and speak with a regional accent (see above)
Girls who stalk (see below)
đĽA/V of the WeekđĽ
> *annoying egalitarian voice* Oh, so when a women stalks a man itâs fine? Yeah, probably.
> Erik Prince on Caribbean Rhythms, about what else: war (what is it good for, anyway?)
>
and speak with OG PUA figurehead Ross Jeffries. Fascinating internet lore, and worth paying attention to, given how some early DR figures emerged out of the wellspring of the manosphere.đ°Reads of the Weekđ°
>Â Last week we poasted an essay from
about Irelandâs constitutional amendment that would remove the mention of âmothers.â It seems like a tiny change of an outdated language, but actually amounts to a big shift toward total erasure of rights and protections that mothers might have as mothers. Anyway, reports that they killed it! Nice work, Ireland.
>
on Rural White Rage.
>
explores the death worship behind the facade of care and kindness in Canadaâs medically-assisted suicide factories.
>
, writing for , encourages you to embrace your Napoleonic conviction, and reject data-driven analysis paralysis.
>
surveys Substackâs dissident right by mapping its leading lights across a matrix of whether theyâre fundamentally optimistic or pessimistic, and at what level (politics, culture, or belief).
> Going deeper,
is digging into the 21 factions that make up the Rightosphere, beginning with a group of Postliberals. Extremely our shit.
> Missed this one last week:
writes of elites, piggybacking from a big Rasmussen study. Who are elites? What motivates them?
>
on the Ameican military brass infiltration by trans ideologues.
>
thinks that most peopleâs mental models of the world are so fried that our political problems are near-unresolvable.
>
thinks Settlers of Catan is the huwhite manâs game.
>
â Mic Solana writes about TikTokâs effort to ingratiate itself with American leaders.
>
reviews âs memoir about climbing out of foster care dysfunction, and the pitfalls of personal liberty.
>
thinks the coming flood of AI-generated content will destroy academic publishing.
đŚTweets of the WeekđŚ
There you have it, folks. As always, we are publishing All the Shit thatâs Fit to Poast, twice a week. Follow us on Twitter to see our take on who posted the top thread, longread and tweet, along with lots of other banter and hijinks between issues that you wonât see on Substack. See you next time!
"F-T-F trans"
Who coined this term again? Was it Freia @moonbeamdreams, Inez Stepman or someone else?
Anyway, it's got to be one of the pithiest descriptors of an archetype we will all (unfortunately), be forced to deal with more and more as the scene becomes big enough to attract them.
Unrelated question: Is there a "parallel-Wikipedia," or "parallel-Wikimedia." Many Substackers will link to Wikipedia when tangentially touching a subject or event, to allow the reader easy access to a summary of information. But as it isn't expressly right-wing, the moderation will (if not already) be curated by left-wingers. Couple with automated moderation through bots, and the threat that DIE-chatbots have on teaching, it seems apt to have an online compendium of knowledge safeguarded.