#161. Pretty girl say bad word
Welcome to the NRP. We are curating the best of those extremely-online extremists known as the "New Right."
🧵Threads of the Week🧵
> A pretty girl said a bad word, the worst word, in fact, and the e-right stood up to gift her Reddit Gold for winning the internet. She racked up 100k followers over night for a soft-R. Are we down that bad, boys? Have we been the recipients of female disgust for so long that a single hottie rolling her eyes at the other side is enough to make her our queen? Are we that thirsty for transgression? Can we not just say no for once? But wait, what’s this? Get a load of of that pre-op schnozzola. Psy-op alert! Fall, back boys! Regroup!
> They’re getting rid of likes and it feels like it’s only going to benefit grifters with fake engagement, and hurt people trying to make a genuine connection.
> In an essay featured below, Spencer Klavan argues that we need right-wing arts benefactors. But maybe that’s a pipe dream because regular rich people who earned their wealth want their wealth to earn. We need kings and aristocrats with money to spare, who don’t see their patronage as an investment.
> The regime is doubling down on mIsiNfoRmaTioN as the explanation for why deplorables are they way they are, and it’s like, yes, please keep telling these relentlessly kicked-around and shit-on people that the only reason they have grievances is because they’re stupid idiots who were tricked.
> Democracy is whatever serves democrats.
>
shoots off what is hopefully the final volley in the Sundress Wars.> Auron skins Richard Spencer.
🎥A/V of the Week🎥
NRP Cub Reporter Ace helped out this week with A/V and Reads. Thanks Ace!
>
interviews Mr. Race Realism himself: Jared Taylor. Tune in for all the lore and their infamous musical collab from 2016.>
, in discussion with , describes using Tolkien wisdom against modernism.>
, Cool Fraiser, and reminisce on a millennial classic on the 20-year anniversary of Napoleon Dynamite (and its consequences).>
hosts globetrotting academic David Polansky on the origins of nationalism.📰Reads of the Week📰
> Our favorite gay flamingo
is wants good art, and the Claremont editor offers a wake-up call to would-be conservative art patrons.>
continues his hidden history of American communism. WW1-era Fights between American Legion and IWW seem to resemble the union brawls from Hoffa (1994). They took a veteran’s parade as an opportunity to carry out a war in the streets. A trial went in favor of the IWW, one of many crimes gone under the radar.>
uses Tolkien’s palantir to frame the alluring dangers of our social media ecosystem. Alongside the thesis, a more nuanced view of the internet’s landscape becomes clear—a place where fantasy may not be far from this unreal app.> The feminization of the most conservatively coded organization created men like General Milley.
charts the decline of the U.S. Army’s branding to find out where and how things went wrong.> What drives the declining community? Putnam blamed the loss of social clubs, and Twenge argues technology.
and connect these trends and find that Zoomers can be “entertained in total isolation.” The delineation of eras helps condense the social tide in the U.S. and how we began “coming apart”> The manosphere and its consequences:
calls out a disgraced prep school teacher who was fired for promoting a Tate-tier course for young men. Although he’s latched onto a real social problem, his lack of nuance puts him in “grifter” territory.> Racial agitation may be a psyop.
argues that organizations like the Ford Foundation have their hands in some of the most vivid examples of social unrest. For example, the popularization of the Hispanic identity may stem from a manufactured push for politicized advocacy groups. The results? A clash of civilizations.>
compares TPUSA promos to the Natalist Conference and how they frame topics concerning declining fertility rates. This conservative contra-dissident dichotomy allows college students to check out all the resources they have available intellectually. With more women entering the movement, Pentsak helps them as their guide.>
argues against the self-affirming tendency to generate memories of one’s youthful adventures. Although Zoomers could use them, the motivation stems from the same selfish desire to stack Polaroids around your mirror. The intent may be good, but don’t use your friends to feed your narcissism.> A Teddy Roosevelt vibe check never disappoints.
describes the incredible life of the 26th president. Like a man out of Madison Grant’s dream, his pre-modern tendencies make him a great man of history. This is a reminder to honor heroes on the upcoming holiday.😬Cringe Corner😬
> Folks, they got us!
explains the nefarious “woke right.” Anons rest their heads in shame as they read the incriminating similarities between identity politics on the left and right. Be careful with nationalist talking points, it might get you an expose from James Lindsey.> The Atlantic says that right-wing anons secretly yearn to be doxxed. It’s a “repressed pleasure,” like doxx us harder, daddy. Look, just because a few of them managed to withstand exposure because they’d spent years shoring up defenses for such an occasion doesn’t mean that the many thousands of other weekend warrior dissidents don’t live in constant fear that some SPLC creep is gonna call their boss because they once tweeted “I personally don’t care for it when the drag queens give kids lap dances.”
🕵️♂️Dudley of the Week🕵️♂️
> I don’t like to complain about being shadowbanned or throttled or deboosted, because having worked in tech, I know a lot of this stuff can be explained by poor engineering and user error rather than malice, and because it makes you sound like an impotent whiner. BUT, something fishy happened to me on the timeline after I produced the biggest banger in NRP history.
🐦Tweets of the Week🐦
There you have it, folks. As always, we are publishing All the Shit that’s Fit to Poast, twice a week. Follow us on Twitter to see our take on who posted the top thread, read and tweet, along with lots of other banter and hijinks between issues that you won’t see on Substack. AND…the NRP Chatroom is open for businesses, for you can discuss the latest edition and argue autistically over the picks there right now. See you in the Chat!
I will defend that white girl. Yeah RFH is right, but that doesn't matter.
You guys realize that "stupid" people will have to agree with us right? It is a good thing. Yeah, they aren't eloquent, and they are the equivalent of a toddler saying "fuck", but they are OUR people. We want them, and we need them. Is it cringe that that e-girl gets tons of followers? Yes. But it still represents one more small instance of our messaging spreading.
We want basic white moms to not care if a bunch of yappy browns call them racist. We have all seen that old 4chan post. Her thoughts passed through the "is this socially acceptable for me to say" filter and were deemed good. Her friends (a bunch of other white moms or soon to be moms) will defend her and congratulate her for the new fame.
Counter signal this woman if you love losing, but for everyone else NETTR.
I don't know who won the sundress wars because I'm not gonna read a 5,000 word Zero HP dissertation on it. I will say though, that sundresses are good. Generally.
If that's the conclusion everyone finally came to then, welcome to the right side of history.
For Teddy Roosevelt, I think he's one of the best figures of American History.
He gets a lot of hate from the right for the establishment of national parks, though.
(And also for being a bit of a larping cowboy).
I think there's validity to the criticisms. But also believe that the preservation of nature and our natural resources is important.
Most people on the right seem to recognize this on a fundamental level - the pictures of women in sundresses are running through grassy fields, not dystopian techno hellscapes - but I'll leave it to smarter people than me to flesh out that argument without sounding like Greta Thunberg.